docs
/ test (push) Successful in 8s

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-01 12:07:26 +02:00
parent b0c0074f7f
commit 2696044a02
3 changed files with 78 additions and 0 deletions
+36
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Domain Docs
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
## Before exploring, read these
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists — it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
## File structure
Single-context repo (most repos):
```
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
```
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
## Flag ADR conflicts
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Issue tracker: Gitea
Issues for this repo live in Gitea at `git.forteapps.net/Forte/launchpad`. Use the Gitea API or `tea` CLI.
## Conventions
- **Create an issue**: `tea issue create --title "..." --description "..."`
or via API: `curl -X POST "https://git.forteapps.net/api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues" -H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"title":"...","body":"..."}'`
- **Read an issue**: `tea issue view <number>` or API `GET /api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues/<number>`
- **List issues**: `tea issue list` or API `GET /api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues?state=open`
- **Comment on an issue**: `tea issue comment <number> "..."` or API `POST /api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues/<number>/comments`
- **Apply labels**: API `POST /api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues/<number>/labels` with `{"labels": [<label_id>]}`
- **Close**: API `PATCH /api/v1/repos/Forte/launchpad/issues/<number>` with `{"state": "closed"}`
Infer the repo from `git remote -v`.
## Pull requests as a triage surface
**PRs as a request surface: no.**
## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
Create a Gitea issue.
## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
Fetch the issue via API or `tea issue view <number>`.
+15
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# Triage Labels
The skills speak in terms of five canonical triage roles. This file maps those roles to the actual label strings used in this repo's issue tracker.
| Label in mattpocock/skills | Label in our tracker | Meaning |
| -------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| `needs-triage` | `needs-triage` | Maintainer needs to evaluate this issue |
| `needs-info` | `needs-info` | Waiting on reporter for more information |
| `ready-for-agent` | `ready-for-agent` | Fully specified, ready for an AFK agent |
| `ready-for-human` | `ready-for-human` | Requires human implementation |
| `wontfix` | `wontfix` | Will not be actioned |
When a skill mentions a role (e.g. "apply the AFK-ready triage label"), use the corresponding label string from this table.
Edit the right-hand column to match whatever vocabulary you actually use.